COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SINGLE ANASTMOSIS DUODENO-ILEAL BYPASS-SLEEVE AND MINI-GASTRIC BYPASS AFTER FAILED SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY IN MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Bariatric Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine- Ain Shams University, Cairo – Egypt.

2 Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine- Ain Shams University, Cairo – Egypt.

Abstract

Background: About 10-30% of the SG patients are associated with long-term failure, due either to inadequate weight loss or to renewed weight gain. Objective: To compare weight loss as well as the metabolic effects of 2 types of bariatric surgery after failure of primary SG; Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass-Sleeve (SADI-S) and Mini- Gastric bypass (MGB), in the first year postoperative follow up. Patients and Methods: This study is a prospective controlled study which included 30 patients underwent bariatric and metabolic surgeries at Ain-Shams University El-Demerdash Hospital, Cairo,
Egypt from July 2017 to July 2018 with one year of postoperative follow up till July 2019. A comprehensive assessment program was carefully structured so that a disciplined routine is followed in each patient. All patients were preoperatively evaluated with provision of extensive information and consented to participate in the study. Results: According to our results, the SADI-S group presented markedly higher percentage of EWL of 91.4% vs 71.6% in MGB after
one year. Control of DM, with HbA1c below 6%, was obtained in 86.6% in both groups with more decrease in mean HbA1c of SADIS being 5.44 vs 5.815% in MGB after one year. Most patients abandoned antidiabetic therapy or at least were controlled by less medications and lower doses. The SADI-S group presented remission of hypertension by 81.8% of patients vs 80% in MGB with far less medications. Lipid profile improvement was noticed in both groups with slightly higher resolution in SADIS group by 93.3% vs 86.6% for total cholesterol, 86.6% vs 80% for T.G, 80% vs 86.6% for LDL, 60% vs 67.6% for HDL in SADIS and MGB patients respectively. Although the nutritional deficiency is still a considerable concern after SADIS, ours study didn’t show intense difference from MGB provided that proper vitamin supplementation and patient compliance are maintained postoperatively. Conclusion: When compared to gastric bypass, SADI-S appears
to be an effective and safe therapeutic technique as a revisional surgery for failed primary SG with excellent short-term results for treating morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities with a low rate of nutritional complications. Proving its safety and efficacy by further studies and long term follow up will grant it more popularity in the future.

Keywords

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics